Berlin Airport: How the Symbol of German Order Turned Into a €10 Billion Disaster

The Start of a Grand Project

Where It All Went Wrong: A Timeline of Failures

1. 2011: First Delay
   Just months before the scheduled opening, it became clear that construction was far from complete. At first glance, the primary issue seemed to be the malfunctioning fire safety system. However, further inspections revealed numerous other violations: faulty cable lines, miscalculated building loads, and significant deficiencies in terminal management systems.
2. 2012-2016: Leadership Chaos
   Between 2012 and 2016, the project went through a carousel of general directors. Among them was Hartmut Mehdorn, who was dismissed after a scandal over inadequate contractor oversight. He was succeeded by Karsten Mühlenfeld, but even he failed to bring order to the chaos. The constant leadership changes exacerbated delays, as each new director spent time familiarizing themselves with the project and making their own adjustments, further escalating costs.
3. Rising Costs and Postponements
   By 2014, the project’s cost had ballooned to €5 billion. At this time, there were discussions about potentially suspending construction indefinitely. The media openly dubbed BER the “Stupid Valley,” and Germans began questioning whether the airport would ever be completed.
4. 2017: Another Scandal
   In 2017, auditors discovered thousands of fire extinguishers and smoke detectors installed incorrectly. Moreover, it was revealed that the terminal ventilation system was unable to handle the required load, and electrical cables were installed in violation of safety standards. These mistakes pushed the budget to €7 billion.
5. October 2020: Opening After 9 Years of Delays
   After countless delays and cost overruns, the Berlin Brandenburg Airport finally opened its doors in October 2020. However, the celebration was dampened by the COVID-19 pandemic, which had severely reduced passenger traffic. The airport, designed for millions of travelers, began operations nearly empty.

Concrete Numbers and the Scale of Damage

• Budget: Initially €2.4 billion, the final cost amounted to €10 billion.
• Timeline: Planned 5 years of construction turned into 9 years of delays and 14 years from the project’s inception.
• Passenger Capacity: Initially designed for 27 million passengers annually, but in 2021, only 10 million passed through due to the pandemic.
• Cabling System: Fixing mistakes in cable installation cost over €600 million.
• Fire Safety System: Upgrades required an additional €1 billion.

Why Did the Project Fail?

1. Poor Project Management
   The constant turnover of leaders and the lack of a coherent strategy led to chaos at every level. Companies responsible for construction worked without proper coordination, and the project lacked a centralized control structure.
2. Overly Complex Technologies
   Many systems, such as fire safety and terminal automation, were overly complex. For instance, the automatic fire extinguishing system designed specifically for BER was non-functional because no one could program it correctly.
3. Corruption and Price Gouging
   Some contractors inflated prices for materials and services, taking advantage of weak oversight by project management. Investigations revealed that approximately 10% of the budget was wasted on unnecessary expenses.
4. Lack of Oversight
   Throughout the construction process, there was insufficient monitoring by federal and local authorities. Warnings about problems were often ignored, with the hope that the project would “self-correct.”
5. Political Pressure
   Several opening dates were set to align with political events, further complicating the situation. For instance, the 2011 opening was planned to coincide with elections, leading to rushed decisions that only worsened the errors.

How Could This Have Been Avoided?

1. Centralized Management
   If the project had been managed by a unified team with a clear strategy, many problems could have been prevented. Large-scale projects require centralized control to ensure consistency and accountability.
2. Careful Contractor Selection
   Thoroughly vetting contractors and subcontractors, as well as maintaining strict oversight of their work, could have reduced costs and minimized mistakes.
3. Risk Planning
   A project of this magnitude requires detailed risk analysis. For example, complex fire safety systems should have been tested during the early stages rather than at the project’s completion.
4. Transparency
   Transparent budgeting and regular audits could have uncovered corruption and inflated costs early on.
5. Phased Implementation of Technologies
   Instead of implementing complex and costly technologies all at once, a phased approach could have allowed for testing and reduced the risk of failure.

What Lessons Can Be Learned?

1. Clear Management and Oversight
   Lesson number one: without clear management structures, even the most promising projects can turn into disasters. Leaders must ensure transparency and coordination among all participants.
2. Don’t Overcomplicate Technology
   Complex systems are not always better. Technologies should be both innovative and reliable.
3. Control Costs
   Large-scale projects require strict financial oversight. Audits and independent reviews should be regular and mandatory.
4. Accountability and Transparency
   Every participant in a project must be held accountable for their actions. Transparency in decision-making helps prevent corruption and unnecessary spending.

Conclusion

Subscribe to us on Twitter, Facebook, and Telegram to receive exclusive materials, stay up to date with the latest news, and take part in community discussions.

Stay tuned—there’s plenty of interesting content to come!